Weekly Patent Litigation Stats – February 22

.tm-testi .tm-testi-slider__next,.tm-testi .tm-testi-slider__next:hover,.elementor-widget-container .tm-testi .tm-testi-slider__next,.elementor-widget-container .tm-testi .tm-testi-slider__next:hover{--wpr-bg-409b5f76-0291-4e3e-91ec-a7e8be4809ca: url('https://patentyogi.com/wp-content/themes/lanterno/assets/images/tm-testi-slider-next.png');}.tm-testi .tm-testi-slider__prev,.tm-testi .tm-testi-slider__prev:hover,.elementor-widget-container .tm-testi .tm-testi-slider__prev,.elementor-widget-container .tm-testi .tm-testi-slider__prev:hover{--wpr-bg-7c5179a5-c915-47d7-9f21-5226e700936b: url('https://patentyogi.com/wp-content/themes/lanterno/assets/images/tm-testi-slider-prev.png');}div.wpcf7 .ajax-loader{--wpr-bg-a9663bd3-be6a-4616-95bd-19cfd03c20df: url('https://patentyogi.com/wp-content/themes/lanterno/assets/images/ajax-loader.gif');}.story-with-background{--wpr-bg-f5f9e826-fda2-4f30-9a9f-640103aebc8d: url('https://patentyogi.com/wp-content/plugins/royal-elementor-addons/assets/css/');}.bdt-lazy-loading{--wpr-bg-691ae0a8-a61e-4fc9-b108-916ad2a8075b: url('https://patentyogi.com/wp-content/plugins/bdthemes-element-pack-lite/assets/images/loading.svg');}.showcase-active .showcase-panel{--wpr-bg-60aabac5-a8ab-4833-a1e2-fe0639af9623: url('https://patentyogi.com/wp-content/themes/lanterno/assets/images/header_bg.jpg');}body.error404{--wpr-bg-a0783e16-0802-4e4d-b10a-69c7083b682f: url('https://patentyogi.com/');}.header-wrapper{--wpr-bg-e3441918-639c-498a-a07e-fc946c47e976: url('https://patentyogi.com/');}.header-wrapper{--wpr-bg-71786542-172e-471a-8114-2ad26eb26d95: url('https://patentyogi.com/');}

Weekly Patent Litigation Stats – February 22 – 28

Written by